@article {1598048,
	title = {Factors Affecting Predominantly Peripheral Lesion Identification and Grading},
	journal = {Transl Vis Sci Technol},
	volume = {10},
	number = {7},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 06 01},
	pages = {6},
	abstract = {Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine factors affecting predominantly peripheral lesion (PPL) grading, such as qualitative versus quantitative assessment, device type, and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in ultrawide field color images (UWF-CIs). Methods: Patients with DR had UWF-CI qualitatively graded for PPL using standardized techniques and had hemorrhages/microaneurysms (H/Mas) individually annotated for quantitative PPL grading on two different ultrawide field devices. Results: Among 791 eyes of 481 patients, 38.2\% had mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 34.7\% had moderate NPDR, and 27.1\% had severe NPDR to proliferative DR (PDR). The overall agreement between qualitative and quantitative PPL grading was moderate (k = 0.423, P \&lt; 0.001). Agreement rates were fair in eyes with mild NPDR (k = 0.336, P \&lt; 0.001) but moderate in eyes with moderate NPDR (k = 0.525, P \&lt; 0.001) and severe NPDR-PDR (k = 0.409, P \&lt; 0.001). Increasing thresholds for quantitative PPL determination improved agreement rates, with peak agreements at H/Ma count differences of six for mild NPDR, five for moderate NPDR, and nine for severe NPDR-PDR. Based on ultrawide field device type (California = 412 eyes vs. 200Tx = 379 eyes), agreement between qualitative and quantitative PPL grading was moderate for all DR severities in both devices (k = 0.369-0.526, P \&lt; 0.001) except for mild NPDR on the 200Tx, which had poor agreement (k = 0.055, P = 0.478). Conclusions: Determination of PPL varies between standard qualitative and quantitative grading and is dependent on NPDR severity, device type, and magnitude of lesion differences used for quantitative assessment. Translational Relevance: Prior UWF studies have not accounted for imaging and grading factors that affect PPL, such factors need to be reviewed when assessing thresholds for DR progression rates.},
	keywords = {Diabetic Retinopathy, Eye, Humans, Microaneurysm, Severity of Illness Index},
	issn = {2164-2591},
	doi = {10.1167/tvst.10.7.6},
	author = {Ashraf, Mohamed and Rageh, Abdulrahman and Gilbert, Michael and Tolls, Dorothy and Fleming, Alan and Souka, Ahmed and El-Baha, Samir and Cavallerano, Jerry D and Sun, Jennifer K and Aiello, Lloyd Paul and Silva, Paolo S}
}
