Immunology and Uveitis

An array of retinochoroid imaging modalities aid in comprehensive evaluation of the immunopathological changes in the retina and choroid, forming the core component for the diagnosis and management of inflammatory disorders such as uveitis. The recent technological breakthroughs have led to the development of imaging platforms that can evaluate the layers of retina and choroid and the structural and functional alteration in these tissues. Ophthalmologists heavily rely on imaging modalities such as dye-based angiographies (fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography), optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, as well as dye-less angiography such as optical coherence tomography angiograph,y for establishing a precise diagnosis and understanding the pathophysiology of the diseases. Furthermore, these tools are now being deployed with a 'multimodal' approach for swift and accurate diagnosis. In this comprehensive review, we outline the imaging platforms used for evaluation of posterior uveitis and discuss the organized, algorithmic approach for the assessment of the disorders. Additionally, we provide an insight into disease-specific characteristic pathological changes and the established strategies to rule out disorders with overlapping features on imaging.

PURPOSE: To compare vision acuity outcomes of long-term steroid therapy compared with immunomodulatory therapy for treatment of sympathetic ophthalmia. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, comparative clinical study. METHODS: Patients with sympathetic ophthalmia treated from March 2005 to October 2022 with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. Visual acuity outcomes were compared by steroid and immunomodulatory treatment modality. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with sympathetic ophthalmia were included in the study, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 17 years. Higher rates of vision loss correlated with longer periods of active uveitis and steroid treatment. Lower rates of vision loss correlated with longer periods of uveitis remission on immunomodulatory therapy alone and drug-free remission. Treatment with alkylating agents or combination therapy with an antimetabolite, a biologic-response modifier, and cyclosporine are more likely to result in sympathetic ophthalmia remission. CONCLUSION: Immunomodulatory therapy leads to superior vision outcomes in cases of steroid-resistant or recurrent sympathetic ophthalmia. Steroid therapy may be useful for acute or recalcitrant sympathetic uveitis but is insufficient for long-term inflammatory control. PRéCIS: This manuscript describes a retrospective analysis of vision outcomes in patients with sympathetic ophthalmia. Results indicate that long-term immunomodulatory therapy is associated with better vision outcomes than long-term steroid therapy for sympathetic ophthalmia treatment.

Chronic uveitis comprises heterogeneous clinical entities characterized by sustained and recurrent intraocular inflammation that is believed to be driven by autoimmune responses. The management of chronic uveitis is challenging with the limited availability of efficacious treatments, and the underlying mechanisms mediating disease chronicity remain poorly understood as the majority of experimental data are derived from the acute phase of the disease (the first 2-3 weeks post-induction). Herein, we investigated the key cellular mechanisms underlying chronic intraocular inflammation using our recently established murine model of chronic autoimmune uveitis. We demonstrate unique long-lived CD44hi IL-7R+ IL-15R+ CD4+ memory T cells in both retina and secondary lymphoid organs after 3 months postinduction of autoimmune uveitis. These memory T cells functionally exhibit antigen-specific proliferation and activation in response to retinal peptide stimulation in vitro. Critically, these effector-memory T cells are capable of effectively trafficking to the retina and accumulating in the local tissues secreting both IL-17 and IFN-γ upon adoptively transferred, leading to retinal structural and functional damage. Thus, our data reveal the critical uveitogenic functions of memory CD4+ T cells in sustaining chronic intraocular inflammation, suggesting that memory T cells can be a novel and promising therapeutic target for treating chronic uveitis in future translational studies.

In the current literature, clinical registry cohorts related to ocular inflammation are few and far between, and there are none involving multi-continental international data. Many existing registries comprise administrative databases, data related to specific uveitic diseases, or are designed to address a particular clinical problem. The existing data, although useful and serving their intended purposes, are segmented and may not be sufficiently robust to design prognostication tools or draw epidemiological conclusions in the field of uveitis and ocular inflammation. To solve this, we have developed the Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS) Clinical Registry. OASIS collects prospective and retrospective data on patients with all types of ocular inflammatory conditions from centers all around the world. It is a primarily web-based platform with alternative offline modes of access. A comprehensive set of clinical data ranging from demographics, past medical history, clinical presentation, working diagnosis to visual outcomes are collected over a range of time points. Additionally, clinical images such as optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography studies may be uploaded. Through the capturing of diverse, well-structured, and clinically meaningful data in a simplified and consistent fashion, OASIS will deliver a comprehensive and well organized data set ripe for data analysis. The applications of the registry are numerous, and include performing epidemiological analysis, monitoring drug side effects, and studying treatment safety efficacy. Furthermore, the data compiled in OASIS will be used to develop new classification and diagnostic systems, as well as treatment and prognostication guidelines for uveitis.

We have read the article entitled "Similarities in clinical course and outcome between juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated and ANA-positive idiopathic anterior uveitis: data from a population-based nationwide study in Germany" by Heiligenhaus et al. While we appreciate the work conducted by the authors, we have several comments we would like to address. First, the follow-up interval of 2 years is too short to conclude that the clinical course between two chronic pathologies is not significantly different. Second, remission status was determined by uveitis inactivity during the 2-year follow-up visit without any mention of flare frequency or length of remission, which is not a reliable measure of uveitis control. Third, ANA-positive idiopathic anterior uveitis is not a classification with a distinct clinical phenotype, and additional reports of serologic investigations would have been helpful.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to investigate the idea that inflammatory events of the conjunctiva and ocular surface may act as triggering events for the onset of ocular mucus membrane pemphigoid (oMMP). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with biopsy-proven oMMP and no systemic pemphigoid disease. The presence, or absence, of the following inflammatory conditions at the time of OMMP diagnosis was noted: significant eyelid disease, significant atopic eye disease, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, graft-versus-host disease, viral keratitis, sarcoidosis with ocular involvement, chemical burns, medicamentosa, Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus with ocular involvement, and epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. Response to immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) was also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 779 patient records were identified. Conjunctival biopsy was present in 724 patients, with 646 (89.2%) being positive. One hundred thirty-nine patients (21.5%) with positive biopsies had extraocular pemphigoid disease and were excluded from further analysis. Of the 507 included patients, 154 (30.4%) had at least one of the specified inflammatory conditions present at the time of OMMP diagnosis. One hundred eighteen patients (23.3%) had only 1 such condition, 35 (6.9%) had 2, and 1 patient had 3. In patients with at least one of these conditions present, response to IMT was seen in 84.9% of patients with sufficient follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that oMMP may arise as a secondary pathology to acute inflammatory events or chronic inflammatory states of the conjunctiva and ocular surface.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, little is known regarding bone health surveillance for glucocorticoid-exposed non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients or their baseline risks of skeletal fragility outcomes. METHODS: Using claims data, we calculated rates of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening for glucocorticoid-exposed NIU and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Separately, we compared risks of skeletal fragility metrics amongst NIU patients, RA patients, and controls, independent of glucocorticoid use. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of NIU patients to have a DXA scan was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.65; p < .001) compared to RA patients. The aHR for any skeletal fragility outcome amongst NIU patients was 0.97 (p < .02) compared to normal controls, while RA patients had excess risk (aHR, 1.15; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: NIU patients are 36% less likely to receive a DXA scan after high-dose glucocorticoid exposure compared with RA patients. No elevated risk of osteoporosis for NIU patients was found compared to normal controls.

Uveitis is a disease complex characterized by intraocular inflammation of the uvea that is an important cause of blindness and social morbidity. With the dawn of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning integration in health care, their application in uveitis creates an avenue to improve screening and diagnosis. Our review identified the use of artificial intelligence in studies of uveitis and classified them as diagnosis support, finding detection, screening, and standardization of uveitis nomenclature. The overall performance of models is poor, with limited datasets and a lack of validation studies and publicly available data and codes. We conclude that AI holds great promise to assist with the diagnosis and detection of ocular findings of uveitis, but further studies and large representative datasets are needed to guarantee generalizability and fairness.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of vaccine-associated uveitis (VAU) after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and evaluate uveitis onset interval and clinical presentations in the patients. DESIGN: A retrospective study from December 11, 2020, to May 9, 2022, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with VAU after administration of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, Pfizer Inc/BioNTech SE), mRNA-1273 (Moderna, Moderna Therapeutics Inc), and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals) vaccine worldwide. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the demographics, clinical history, and presentation was performed. We evaluated the correlation among the 3 vaccines and continuous and categorical variables. A post hoc analysis was performed between uveitis onset interval after vaccination and age, dose, and vaccine type. Finally, a 30-day risk analysis for VAU onset postvaccination was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The estimated global crude reporting rate, observed to expected ratio of VAU in the United States, associated ocular and systemic presentations, and onset duration. RESULTS: A total of 1094 cases of VAU were reported from 40 countries with an estimated crude reporting rate (per million doses) of 0.57, 0.44, and 0.35 for BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively. The observed to expected ratio of VAU was comparable for BNT162b2 (0.023), mRNA-1273 (0.025), and Ad26.COV2.S (0.027). Most cases of VAU were reported in patients who received BNT162b2 (n = 853, 77.97%). The mean age of patients with VAU was 46.24 ± 16.93 years, and 68.65% (n = 751) were women. Most cases were reported after the first dose (n = 452, 41.32%) and within the first week (n = 591, 54.02%) of the vaccination. The onset interval for VAU was significantly longer in patients who received mRNA-1273 (21.22 ± 42.74 days) compared with BNT162b2 (11.42 ± 23.16 days) and rAd26.COV2.S (12.69 ± 16.02 days) vaccines (P < 0.0001). The post hoc analysis revealed a significantly shorter interval of onset for the BNT162b2 compared with the mRNA 1273 vaccine (P < 0.0001). The 30-day risk analysis showed a significant difference among the 3 vaccines (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The low crude reporting rate and observed to expected ratio suggest a low safety concern for VAU. This study provides insights into a possible temporal association between reported VAU events and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines; however, further investigations are required to delineate the associated immunological mechanisms.

Immune recovery uveitis (IRU) is an ocular form of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, which is rare in the pediatric population. We report a case of IRU in an 11-year-old girl with a history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in the setting of acute leukemia, who developed uveitis, vitritis, retinitis, and vasculitis during immune reconstitution. She was found to have negative CMV antigenemia, and the disease occurred during concurrent systemic antiviral therapy. Anterior chamber tap confirmed the absence of the CMV in the eye, and recurrent blood samples continued to reveal absent CMV viral particles systemically while her lymphocyte count was steadily increasing. The patient responded to oral steroids, leading to resolution of active retinitis. Tapering the steroids caused a mild reactivation of the ocular immune response.

PURPOSE: Clinical registries are increasingly important in research and clinical advancement. This review explores and compares current uveitis registries and recommends future directions on how uveitis registries can complement one another for synergistic effect and benefit. METHODS: From a systematic search, 861 citations were screened for longitudinal, non-interventional, and multicenter uveitis-specific registries. Additional registries were identified via consultations with uveitis experts. Characteristics of all registries were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Four registries were identified: Treatment Exit Options for Non-infectious Uveitis, AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance International Registry, Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study, and Fight Uveitis Blindness!. Despite certain differences, these registries have the overarching goal of collecting large quantities of real-world, high-quality patient data to improve the understanding of uveitis. CONCLUSION: The four uveitis registries share similar goals and collect clinical data from overlapping geographical regions. There is vast potential for collaboration, including data sharing to further augment datasets for analysis.

We quantitatively evaluated the efficacy of antitubercular therapy (ATT) in tubercular uveitis (TBU) patients. Main outcome measures include inflammation recurrence, inflammation reduction, complete resolution of inflammation, improved visual acuity (VA), ability to taper corticosteroids to < 10 mg/day without inflammatory progression, and use of adjunctive immunosuppressants while on ATT. This review is prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020206845). Forty-nine studies reporting data for 4,017 TBU patients were included. In comparative studies, the odds ratio (OR) of inflammatory recurrence was 0.33 (95%CI:0.19-0.60) for TBU patients treated with ATT±corticosteroid versus no ATT. For TBU patients treated with ATT±corticosteroid, the pooled absolute incidences of inflammatory recurrence, inflammatory reduction, complete resolution of inflammation, and visual acuity improvement were 13% (n=310/2,216; 95%CI:9-18), 81% (n=217/276; 95%CI: 62-95), 83% (n=1,167/1,812; 95%CI: 77-89), and 65% (n=347/542; 95%CI:51-78), respectively. Corticosteroids were tapered to <10 mg/day without inflammatory progression in 91% (n=326/395; 95%CI:78-99) of patients, 9% (n=121/1,376; 95%CI:6-13) of whom were administered concomitant immunosuppressive agents alongside ATT. We conclude that treatment of TBU with ATT±corticosteroid is associated with a high level of control or improvement of inflammation. More prospective studies with detailed reporting of ATT regimens, patient subgroups, and outcomes are required to better evaluate ATT effectiveness.

A 49-year-old man presented with acute unilateral blurred vision one week after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A unilateral serous detachment of the macula, intraretinal hemorrhages, vitritis, and anterior chamber cell was found. Diagnostic testing was negative for infectious and inflammatory causes, and a diagnosis of acute idiopathic maculopathy (AIM) was made. Symptoms and serous detachment resolved over 12 weeks, with residual retinal pigment epithelial changes consistent with the disease course. AIM is a rare diagnosis that presented in close proximity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination without evidence of coxsackievirus infection. Further research is necessary to clarify an association between this vaccine and uveitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify techniques used for quantification of choriocapillaris (CC) flow in eyes with uveitis using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), report reliability and level of correlation with techniques such as indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). METHODS: A systematic search of several databases was done. The studies were analyzed for techniques of measurement, reliability, and correlation with other modalities. Risk of bias assessment was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. CC vessel density (7 studies) and flow deficit area (4 studies) were the most used indices. There was significant heterogeneity in the studies due to differences in the scan protocol, thresholding strategy, and analysis. Comparison with ICGA was performed by only one study, and reliability indices were reported by only two studies. CONCLUSION: OCTA is a useful tool to measure the CC vascularity in eyes with uveitis. However, standardized acquisition and analysis protocols are needed.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) in paediatric anterior uveitis. METHODS: Chart review of all patients ≤ 18 years treated for anterior uveitis using a stepladder approach during a 10-year period. The type and duration of IMT were noted. The data were analysed depending on chronicity, aetiology, and type of IMT using appropriate statistical tests. The outcome measures included ocular complications, the need for surgical intervention, and visual outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients (191 eyes) were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis was 7 years (interquartile range (IQR): 7.5 years). The median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 6 years). The most common causes of anterior uveitis were Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (64 patients, 47.8%) and undifferentiated (33 patients, 24.6%). All patients were started on topical steroids and cycloplegics. 94 (70%) patients required IMT. 92 (68.6%) were started on Methotrexate as the first agent, of which 21 (22%) were switched to a different agent owing to side effects. Biologic agent was added in 55 (41%) patients. 21 (16%) required switch to a second biologic agent, 5 (3.7%) to third, and 1 (0.8%) to fourth biologic agent. At the last exam, 11 (8%) had persistent inflammation. 55 (41%) had ocular complications, and 113 (84%) had a best corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/40. CONCLUSION: Early introduction of IMT and switch to different agents may be required to control anterior uveitis and reduce the complications in children. IMT is safe and effective in treating paediatric anterior uveitis.