Ophthalmic Education

Pak C, Hall N, Bekele DT, Kollmann MKH, Tadele T, Tekle-Haimanot R, Taye T, Qureshi B, Yalew W, Gower EW, Kempen JH. Impact of refresher training on the outcomes of trachomatous trichiasis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2023;Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Trachomatous trichiasis (TT) is a severe consequence of chronic inflammation/conjunctival scarring resulting from trachoma, the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Our prospective cohort study evaluated the effectiveness of refresher training (RT) for experienced surgeons (1-22 years) on the outcomes of upper lid (UL) TT surgery in rural Ethiopia. METHODS: Patients undergoing UL TT surgery in at least one eye by a participating surgeon were included. Patients were split into two cohorts: patients enrolled prior to (C1) and after (C2) RT. RT consisted of a 1-week programme with practice on a HEAD START mannequin and supportive supervision in live surgery by expert trainers. Data were collected at preoperative enrolment, and at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. The primary outcome was development of postoperative TT (PTT). A series of multivariate generalised estimating equations were fit to model PTT involving potential covariates of interest. RESULTS: A total of 261 eyes contributed by 173 patients were studied between 2017 and 2019. By 1-year postoperatively, 37/128 eyes (28.9%) in C1 and 22/133 eyes (16.5%) in C2 had developed PTT (p=0.03). Other than surgeon RT participation, no factors studied were associated with differences in PTT. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a significant reduction in the risk of PTT after experienced surgeons' participation in RT as compared with eyes receiving surgery before RT. This observation suggests a significant potential benefit of the RT with HEAD START mannequin practice and supportive supervision during surgery, and suggests RT may be a valuable strategy to improve surgical outcomes.
Azad AD, Yuan M, Weinert M, Rosenblatt TR, Miller JW, Lorch A. The Transition to Ophthalmology Residency: A National Survey of the Combined Ophthalmology PGY-1 Program. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) 2023;15(2):e188-e196.Abstract
Background  In 2017, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education announced all ophthalmology residency programs would provide a combined transitional or joint preliminary program for first postgraduate year (PGY-1) residents, with mandatory implementation by 2023. Purpose  This study aimed to survey ophthalmology residency program directors, postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) ophthalmology residents who were a part of the first, official combined ophthalmology PGY-1 year, and postgraduate year 3 (PGY-3) residents who were a PGY-1 resident the year prior to integration to evaluate characteristics and perspectives on the combined ophthalmology PGY-1 year. Methods  A national, internet survey-based study approved by the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) was disseminated to the AUPO listserv of program directors (PDs) and PGY-2 and PGY-3 ophthalmology residents from July to August 2022 and then again April to June 2023. Results  Twenty-six PDs completed the survey (response rate 20.3% out of 128 PDs). Forty-one PGY-2 ophthalmology residents who underwent the combined ophthalmology PGY-1 year and 33 PGY-3 ophthalmology residents also completed the survey. Most PGY-1 curricula focused on exposure to comprehensive ophthalmology and provided indirect ophthalmoscope, slit lamp, and refraction skills training to residents. Early exposure to fundamentals and clinical workflows were commonly cited benefits to the integration. When PDs were surveyed about how well-prepared PGY-1 residents who went through the combined year are for the PGY-2 relative to the prior year's class, 16 (61.5%) responded "better prepared." PGY-2 residents also reported a relatively higher level of clinical preparedness and familiarity with ophthalmology co-residents than PGY-3 residents. Several areas of improvement cited by both PDs and residents were identified including a dedicated didactic curriculum and more time in ophthalmology during the PGY-1 year. Conclusions  We found an overall net benefit from the integration of the combined ophthalmology PGY-1 year. Benefits include early exposure to clinical skills and knowledge specific to ophthalmology, leading to increased confidence and preparedness for the rigorous transition to ophthalmology residency. We also identified many areas for improvement to optimize the PGY-1 year including a formal curriculum and additional time in ophthalmology. Programs should work closely with their residents, faculty, and non-ophthalmology PDs to refine the PGY-1 for the benefit of future ophthalmologists.
Oke I, Hunter DG, Mantagos IS, Heidary G. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical volume of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus fellows. J AAPOS 2023;27(5):305-307.Abstract
This study used data from the annual fellowship survey over 7 academic years (2014-15 to 2020-21) to describe the trends in surgical experience for pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus fellows and to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trainee surgical volume. The overall number of procedures performed by fellows in the primary surgeon role declined during the first academic year impacted by the pandemic but recovered in the second year. There was an increase in the number of intraocular cases performed per year during the 7-year study interval.
Bhullar PK, Venkateswaran N. Ophthalmology Residency in the United States: The Case for a National Curriculum. Semin Ophthalmol 2023;38(2):167-177.Abstract
To identify strategies for effective curriculum development and implementation in United States (US) ophthalmology residency training programs. A literature review was conducted for all English-language PubMed/Medline articles relating to ophthalmology residency education or curriculum/curricula. Despite ACGME-defined program requirements outlining curricular goals for US ophthalmology residency training programs, there is no comprehensive, national curriculum with detailed plans for instruction of necessary topics within the 36-month residency training period. Several articles identify a need for detailed curricula on various topics, propose ideas on how residency programs could create curricula, and explore ways of assessing resident competence. There is a paucity of literature evaluating how ophthalmology residents best learn various ophthalmology topics. We need to develop an intentional, comprehensive, and timely national curriculum for ophthalmology residency programs in the US, with detailed plans on how to meet curricular objectives and consideration of the most effective teaching strategies for different ophthalmology concepts.