Date Published:
2023 May
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To calculate the costs of treatment for diabetic macular edema with bevacizumab-first (step therapy) compared with aflibercept monotherapy. DESIGN: Cost analysis of the treatment arms based on a published study. SUBJECTS: None. METHODS: Published results from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network protocol AC were used to assess costs. Data incorporated in the usage and outcome model included the frequency of injections, medication type, visits, and imaging. Costs were modeled based on the 2022 Medicare reimbursement data for both facility (hospital-based) and nonfacility settings in Miami. Outcomes were similar in protocol AC so were not differentially studied. Results were extrapolated so as to estimate lifetime (17 years for the age of the cohort). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of treatment options. RESULTS: Over the 2 years reported in the protocol AC, the cost required to treat in the facility (nonfacility setting) was $42 000 ($32 000) in the aflibercept monotherapy group and $29 000 ($22 000) in the bevacizumab-first group. Extrapolated modeled lifetime costs were $158 000 ($136 000) and $125 000 ($103 000), respectively. The total cost with bevacizumab-first was 33% lower at year 2 and 21% lower at year 17 compared with aflibercept monotherapy. Savings per year for the 2 years results were $6500 ($5000) in the facility (nonfacility) setting. For the extrapolated 17 years model, annual savings were $1900 ($1900) in the facility (nonfacility) setting. The professional fees accounted for a minority of overall costs; in contrast, medication costs accounted for 82% of the total costs for the aflibercept monotherapy and 73% in the bevacizumab-first group at 2 years. Our model predicted an additional 15% lifetime cumulative savings if patients still not meeting the threshold criteria after switching to aflibercept were placed back on bevacizumab, and a similar degree of improvement if those on not meeting threshold criteria on aflibercept monotherapy were switched to bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Medication is the dominant driver of the total expenses associated with the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Although cost savings are realized with bevacizumab-first step therapy, the magnitude was not as much as might be intuited, probably because of the high (70%) incidence of patients switching to aflibercept within protocol AC. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
